gpr-forum.com

Forum dedicated to Ground Penetrating Radar technology
It is currently Sun Nov 18, 2018 1:39 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:26 pm
Posts: 13
what your opinion about these data ?

AKULA 9000 C
pictures 1&2 100 mega hertz antenna.

pictures 3&4 300 mega hertz antenna.


Attachments:
100gkh.jpg
100gkh.jpg [ 79.87 KiB | Viewed 6873 times ]
100v 2.jpg
100v 2.jpg [ 61.98 KiB | Viewed 6873 times ]
300 hh.jpg
300 hh.jpg [ 81.72 KiB | Viewed 6873 times ]
File comment: http://www.gpr-forum.com/download/file.php?mode=view&id=665&sid=92e08e854340c22d4e92f817be188aea
300 hhgg.jpg
300 hhgg.jpg [ 72.43 KiB | Viewed 6874 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 10:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:52 am
Posts: 379
Location: Boden, Sweden
Hi, the data with the GCB-300 looks better in this area. The GCB-100 is not showing much penetration
and the two features you see look like reverberation from a shallow target. But, as much as it appears
a lot everywhere, data from one profile is more often than not insufficient to identify a target. I'd
recommend passing several parallel profiles and see if you can identify the location of the target in
files 3 & 4.
Regards,

_________________
Reinaldo Alvarez Cabrera
Geoscanners AB
Sweden
http://www.geoscanners.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group